As the economy strengthens, home values continue to appreciate, and that means homeowners are raking in the equity.
A report released Thursday by data analytics provider CoreLogic showed that home equity rose 12.3% year-over-year in the second quarter of 2018, meaning that the average homeowner saw their equity increase by $16,153 in one year’s time.
Home equity increased in almost every state, according to the report, with the western states showing the greatest gains.
California led the charge with an average gain of $48,800, followed by Washington with $41,100 and Hawaii with $29,600.
The report also looked at mortgaged homes with negative equity to determine how many properties in the U.S. are currently underwater, with homeowners owing more than the home is worth.
In the second quarter of 2018, it showed that negative equity fell 9%, so that just 4.3% of all mortgaged properties are upside down. In the fourth quarter of 2009, negative equity peaked at 26%.
CoreLogic Chief Economist Frank Nothaft said Q2’s totals mean aggregate home equity gains now total $1 trillion, and that consumers will likely funnel this money back into the economy.
“This wealth gain will support additional consumption spending and home improvement expenditures in coming years,” Nothaft said.
CoreLogic President and CEO Frank Martell said low inventory is contributing to price appreciation.
“Negative equity levels continue to drop across the U.S. with the biggest declines in areas with strong price appreciation,” Martell said. “Further, the relatively low level of shadow inventory contributes to the chronic shortage of housing supply and price increases in many markets.”
For a state-by-state breakdown, check out the two images below. Click to enlarge.
By Elliot Njus | The Oregonian/OregonLive | Posted August 09, 2018 at 06:00 AM | Updated August 09, 2018 at 08:19 AM
A home for sale in Northeast Portland. (Elliot Njus/Staff)
Portland’s run of rapidly rising home prices is slowing down — but it’s not stopping.
Of nearly 70 neighborhoods analyzed by The Oregonian/OregonLive using sale data from the Regional Multiple Listing Service, all but 10 saw the median price rise for homes sold in year’s second quarter compared with a year earlier.
The 10 exceptions include neighborhoods that were among the busiest during the Portland metro’s hot streak.
Together, they saw the median price fall just an average of 3 percent.
That doesn’t necessarily mean homes are losing value — the shift could be the result of slower sales at the highest price tier. But it could also be a sign homesellers are losing leverage over buyers.
Here are the 10 neighborhoods where the median price fell in the second quarter.
— Elliot Njus and Mark Friesen
1. Sellwood-Moreland/Richmond, Portland
In the 97202 ZIP code, there were 170 sales. Homes spent an average of 27 days on the market, and the median sale price was $525,500, down 10.2 percent from $585,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
2. Old Town Chinatown/Pearl District, Portland
In the 97209 ZIP code, there were 98 sales. Homes spent an average of 46 days on the market, and the median sale price was $432,500, down 6 percent from $460,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
In the 97071 ZIP code, there were 102 sales. Homes spent an average of 45 days on the market and the median sales price was $252,500, down 4.9 percent from $265,500 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
4. Felida, Vancouver
In the 98685 ZIP code, there were 148 sales. Homes spent an average of 27 days on the market, and the median sales price was $389,500, down 3.3 percent from $403,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
5. Cedar Hills/Raleigh Hills/Sylvan, Portland
In the 97225 ZIP code, there were 108 sales. Homes spent an average of 30 days on the market, and the median sale price was $535,950, down 2.2 percent from $547,750 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
6. Central Beaverton
In the 97005 ZIP code, there were 83 sales. Homes spent an average of 18 days on the market, and the median sales price was $345,000, down 1.4 percent from $350,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
7. Northwest District, Portland
In the 97210 ZIP code, there were 60 sales. Homes spent an average of 53 days on the market, and the median sale price was $555,000, down 1.2 percent from $562,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
8. Foster-Powell/Woodstock, Portland
In the 97206 ZIP code, there were 254 sales. Homes spent an average of 23 days on the market, and the median sale price was $399,000, down 0.7 percent from $402,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
9. St. Johns/Portsmouth, Portland
In the 97203 ZIP code, there were 150 sales. Homes spent an average of 22 days on the market, and the median sale price was $378,125, down 0.5 percent from $380,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
10. West Lake Oswego
In the 97035 ZIP code, there were 161 sales. Homes spent an average of 27 days on the market, and the median sale price was $510,000, down 0.2 percent from $511,000 a year earlier. More on this neighborhood.
This estate is architecture at its visionary best: It engages, exhilarates and inspires. Casual daily living and lavish entertaining are embraced within this versatile residence. The fenced yard and gardens include a pool & spa, putting green, bocce court, water feature and outdoor dining area with a fireplace & built-in BBQ. This property is ideal for both formal and informal gatherings. Close to High Tech, Forest Park and NW Portland. For more information click here.
“Fourth Quarter home sales dropped by a modest 1.5% compared to the same period last year, with a total of 15,314 homes sold. Although sales were a mixed bag, I still contend that any drop in sales was due to low levels of available inventory rather than declining demand. The average home price in Oregon and SW Washington rose 7% year over year to $363,110. This is down 1.4% from the third quarter of 2017. This slowdown in price growth is likely due to buyers feeling priced out of the market.”
In the near future, your home could be battery operated.
This is especially true if you live in New York, California, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Vermont, Arizona or a growing roster of other states and municipalities experimenting with revamping their electrical grids for the 21st century.
You might not even know your lights are being kept on by the same chemical process that powers your smartphone, since the batteries could be tucked into what looks like a neighborhood junction box, or behind a fence in a substation. But now, thanks to efforts by startups and the utility companies they sell to (and sometimes battle), you might get one right inside your home.
The rise of these home batteries isn’t just a product of our collective obsession with new tech. Their adoption is being driven by a powerful need, says Ravi Manghani, of GTM Research: renewable energy.
Without batteries and other means of energy storage, the ability of utility companies to deliver power could eventually be threatened.
Solar power, especially, tends to generate electricity only at certain times—and it’s rarely in sync with a home’s needs. In some states, such as California and Arizona, there’s an overabundance of solar power in the middle of the day during cool times of the year, then a sudden crash in the evenings, when people get home and energy use spikes.
For utilities, it’s a headache. The price of electricity on interstate markets can go negative at certain times, forcing them to dump excess electricity or pay others to take it.
“This is not a long-term theoretical issue that might happen—this is now,” says Marc Romito, director of customer technology at Arizona Public Service, the state’s largest electric utility.
There’s something ruggedly individualistic and inherently American about having batteries in your home. They’re good for keeping power going in a disaster, as customers of the two biggest firms by sales volume in this field, Sonnen and Tesla, demonstrated in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma. And in combination with rooftop solar panels, they free people from total dependence on the grid—a kind of energy cable-cutting that wonks call “grid defection.
The very real possibility of grid defection is changing the power dynamics between utilities and their customers.
Last week, real-estate developer Mandalay Homes announced a plan to build up to 4,000 ultra energy-efficient homes—including 2,900 in Prescott, Arizona—that will feature 8 kilowatt-hour batteries from German maker Sonnen. It could eventually be the biggest home energy-storage project in the U.S., says Blake Richetta, senior vice president at Sonnen.
The homes, which will come with the Sonnen battery preinstalled, will be part of a Sonnen-managed “virtual power plant for demand response” that could allow the houses to stabilize the grid, lower its carbon footprint and decrease peak load, says Mr. Richetta.
While the Mandalay Homes project is still in the blueprint stage, with only one test home built so far, this kind of radical, battery-enabled rethink of the grid is already happening in Vermont.
In partnership with Tesla Energy, Green Mountain Power is offering 2,000 of its customers the opportunity to have a Tesla Powerwall in their home for $15 a month. The 13.5 kilowatt-hour batteries retail for $5,500, but the utility can afford to put them in homes because they help the company save on other grid infrastructure, says Mary Powell, GMP’s chief executive and president. “Peaker plants,” for instance, are fired up only when the grid is strained to maximum capacity, saving the utility from using one of its most expensive forms of electricity.
GMP also uses batteries from Sonnen, SimpliPhi and Sunverge. Ms. Powell says the larger battle for home battery storage will be over how each of these companies—and dozens of others—differentiates itself, selling different size batteries adapted for different uses in homes, businesses and utilities.
Arizona Public Service’s Mr. Romito says not all of these batteries are created equal—though he wouldn’t name names.
The biggest challenge to home battery storage remains economics. Utilities’ current rate structures don’t charge most homeowners for using excess power, nor do they change the price based on time of day. For the overwhelming majority of homeowners, the payback on a solar power system with battery storage could take decades.
Batteries aren’t the only way to reduce the need for short-order energy, or so-called “demand response,” says Mr. Romito. Smart thermostats, managed by the utility company, can precool homes when solar power is at peak production, reducing load on the grid in the evening.
This cannot only be as useful as batteries in certain cases, it can be more cost effective. Other possibilities include remotely determining when electric vehicles charge and even shifting large industrial loads to different times of year.
In states where electricity is more affordable, it’s still early days for batteries in homes. But Mr. Romito says users and utilities will continue to move toward them with the inexorable addition of more and more renewables to the grid.
Mr. Manghani of GTM Research agrees. His battery storage adoption forecasts track closely with states and regions where renewable energy is being generated.
Falling prices also help. Battery pack prices have decreased, on average, 24% a year since 2010. Cheaper batteries shorten the resulting payback period, which in turn makes renewable energy more attractive to home owners. In 2016, solar grew faster than any other energy source, according to the International Energy Agency.
At the intersection of these and other trends is a simple fact: For the first time since the discovery of fire, the way humans get energy is set to fundamentally change.
My listing on SW Greenleaf Court was built in 1981 but was inspired by the styles seen so often in mid-century architecture. By incorporating some of the colors, furniture, light fixtures and details from that time, this property would feel fresh yet stay true to its inspiration. For more information on my listing, click here.
The information is not guaranteed and a prospective buyer should verify information with the appropriate party. Windermere Stellar and MJ Steen Group assume no liability for any errors in this information.